Ben Rawlence, Senior Researcher, Africa Division, Human Rights Watch
Mariam was painfully thin. Several of her 13 children peered out from
behind her with hollow eyes. "I am trying to save my children. We are
not living. We are subhuman," she told me. Food aid was available in her
village in Southern Ethiopia. But not for her children. Her husband
belonged to the wrong political party. The same month I was interviewing this desperate mother in 2009, President Obama was telling Ghana's parliament that: "Africa doesn't need strongmen, it needs strong
institutions."
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, one of Africa's
longest serving strongmen, was using food aid as a weapon against
opposition supporters, locking up opponents and journalists, and
shutting down media and civil society organizations that reported on
Ethiopia's slide into authoritarianism. In 2010, his party
unsurprisingly won over 99 percent of the seats in parliament. On May 19, President Obama will welcome Prime Minister Zenawi to the
G-8 summit at Camp David to discuss food security in Africa along with
the democratically elected leaders of Benin, Ghana, and Tanzania.
The
invitation to Meles demonstrates that whatever the Obama administration
has learned from the Arab Spring, it doesn't apply to Africa. It should.
Cosseting autocratic regimes rarely ends well for anybody. Mariam wanted me to tell the world that their aid dollars were being misused. In a 2010 report, "Development without Freedom,"
we did.
Yet the Ethiopian enigma is curious: the more repressive Ethiopia gets,
the more aid it receives from Western governments. Why does a country
with a human rights record rivaling those of repressive Sudan,
Uzbekistan, or Zimbabwe enjoy such solid support in the U.S. and Europe?
Since the
2010 elections
Meles's government has detained dozens, and possibly hundreds, of
opposition members, perceived opposition supporters, and others. No one
knows exactly how many people have been arrested because no independent
organizations have access to all of Ethiopia's known and secret
detention facilities, where torture and ill treatment are common. There
are few Ethiopian human rights groups to investigate the detentions
because in 2009 Ethiopia
passed a law
on non-governmental organizations that strangled most local human
rights groups by cutting off foreign funding. And the government has
regularly detained and deported journalists who try to access the
embattled Ogaden region, successfully cutting off news of the situation.
Of course Ethiopia is a reliable partner on counter-terrorism and
regional security and perceived to be an oasis of stability amid
Eritrea, Sudan, and Somalia. Ethiopia has held terrorism suspects from
Somalia and Kenya for interrogation and hosts a U.S. drone base for
operations in Somalia. Ethiopia intervened in Somalia in 2006 to oust
the militant Union of Islamic Courts and deployed peacekeepers in the
contested region of Abyei between Sudan and South Sudan.
But the security partnership is not the only reason. Ethiopia appears
to be making strong progress on meeting development goals, and donor
partners such as the World Bank are anxious to sustain their
"investments." Yet the proportion of the population requiring food aid
remains stubbornly high and the numbers of Ethiopians fleeing the
country due to repression or in search of economic opportunities they
can't find at home are exploding.
As long as Ethiopia appears to be making progress toward the United
Nations' Millennium Development Goals, donors seem to care little about
how that progress is achieved. Ethiopia even used some foreign-funded development programs to cement
the ruling party's grip on power. As Mariam and many other people we
interviewed told Human Rights Watch the ruling party discriminates
against anyone it perceives as an opponent: access to donor-funded
government services, food aid, housing, employment, promotions,
educational opportunities, and land have all been used to encourage
support for the ruling party.
The government is pursuing controversial resettlement programs,
indirectly supported by foreign assistance, forcing people to leave
their ancestral lands and in some cases leaving them worse off. It has
also expropriated vast tracts of land and forced resettlement of
indigenous communities in the Omo valley, a UNESCO World Heritage site,
to make way for state-run sugar plantations. Meanwhile the government has steadily whittled away what's left of
the independent media. According to the Committee to Protect
Journalists, more journalists have fled Ethiopia in the last decade than
any other nation.
This month, PEN American Center awarded its prestigious Freedom to
Write award to Eskinder Nega, who is fast becoming Ethiopia's best-known
journalist. Eskinder is in jail for the seventh time, but this time he
is charged under a 2009 counterterrorism law that, so far, has primarily
been used to target opposition leaders and journalists. Fifteen other
journalists and opposition members have already been convicted (or
charged) under the law, including
two Swedish journalists who attempted to report on abuses in the Ogaden region.
Before Zenawi's government deported me for reporting on the
politicization of aid, Eskinder Nega told me that he thought President
Obama's Ghana speech heralded a new era for democratic governance in
Africa. If Eskinder was right then, instead of inviting undemocratic leaders
like Zenawi to Camp David, the Obama administration would review its
approach to Ethiopia and call on the government to reverse its assault
on human rights and democracy. But I fear that when Eskinder hears of
the visit in his cell in Kaliti prison, he will know that his faith in
President Obama's words was wrong.
Ben Rawlence is a Senior Researcher in the Africa Division at Human Rights Watch.
Read more
